Anytype vs Zed
61 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #f5f5f3 Text
#ffffff → #393d45 Brand
#3cd9b3 → #004edb Border
#262626 → #e2e2de Display font
Riccione → IBM Plex Serif Body size
16px → 16px colors 54 changed
~
bg #000000 → #f5f5f3 ~
text #ffffff → #393d45 ~
text-strong #ffffff → #16181d ~
brand #3cd9b3 → #004edb ~
brand-hover #2fc4a0 → #003fb5 ~
brand-soft #0e2b25 → rgba(0,78,219,0.08) ~
on-brand #000000 → #ffffff ~
border #262626 → #e2e2de ~
border-strong #3a3a3a → #d4d4ce +
bg-100 #ffffff +
bg-200 #eeede9 +
bg-300 #e7e6e1 +
surface-card #ffffff +
surface-code #1a1b1e +
text-200 #5a5e66 +
text-300 #6b6f78 +
text-400 #86888f +
cta-secondary-bg #ffffff +
cta-secondary-text #16181d +
link #004edb +
link-hover #003fb5 +
border-focus #004edb +
code-bg #1a1b1e +
code-text #e6e6e3 +
semantic-success #2e7d32 +
semantic-warning #b54708 +
semantic-danger #c01919 +
semantic-info #004edb −
bg-deep #000000 −
surface #0d0d0d −
surface-elev #1a1a1a −
surface-hover #242424 −
text-secondary #b8b8b8 −
text-muted #8a8a8a −
text-faint #5c5c5c −
brand-active #27a98a −
brand-text #3cd9b3 −
any-teal #3cd9b3 −
any-blue #18a3f1 −
any-green #4cad00 −
any-amber #ffb522 −
border-soft #1a1a1a −
border-brand #3cd9b3 −
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.50) −
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.65) −
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.80) −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.70) −
success #4cad00 −
success-soft #0f2200 −
warning #ffb522 −
warning-soft #2a1d00 −
danger #ff6a7b −
danger-soft #2e1115 −
info #18a3f1 typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Riccione","size":88} → {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"Riccione","size":48} → {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Riccione","size":36} → {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"writer","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"writer-mono","size":13} radius 2 changed
~
button 8px → 6px ~
card 12px → 8px spacing identical
No differences.