Anytype vs Tinybird
55 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #0a0a0a Text
#ffffff → #ffffff Brand
#3cd9b3 → #27f795 Border
#262626 → #262626 Display font
Riccione → Inter Body size
16px → 16px colors 52 changed
~
bg #000000 → #0a0a0a ~
surface #0d0d0d → #151515 ~
text-strong #ffffff → #e6e6e6 ~
text-muted #8a8a8a → #888888 ~
text-faint #5c5c5c → #5a5a5a ~
brand #3cd9b3 → #27f795 ~
brand-active #27a98a → #1fd87f ~
on-brand #000000 → #0a0a0a ~
border-strong #3a3a3a → #383838 ~
success #4cad00 → #27f795 ~
warning #ffb522 → #fc9f5b ~
danger #ff6a7b → #ff8389 ~
info #18a3f1 → #00c1ff +
surface-soft #101010 +
surface-elevated #1e1e1e +
surface-mint-tint rgba(255,255,255,0.05) +
text-body #b0b0b0 +
brand-dark #008060 +
brand-disabled #16402e +
on-brand-dark #ffffff +
on-dark #ffffff +
link #27f795 +
link-hover #1fd87f +
border-mint #27f795 +
shadow-color rgba(0,0,0,0.6) +
shadow-glow-mint rgba(39,247,149,0.18) +
code-text #ffffff +
code-invocation #27f795 +
code-success #27f795 +
code-error #ff8389 +
code-identifier #00c1ff +
code-value #fc9f5b +
code-diff-added #008060 −
surface-elev #1a1a1a −
surface-hover #242424 −
text-secondary #b8b8b8 −
brand-hover #2fc4a0 −
brand-text #3cd9b3 −
brand-soft #0e2b25 −
any-teal #3cd9b3 −
any-blue #18a3f1 −
any-green #4cad00 −
any-amber #ffb522 −
border-soft #1a1a1a −
border-brand #3cd9b3 −
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.50) −
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.65) −
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.80) −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.70) −
success-soft #0f2200 −
warning-soft #2a1d00 −
danger-soft #2e1115 typography 3 changed
~
display {"family":"Riccione","size":88} → {"family":"Inter","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Riccione","size":48} → {"family":"Inter","size":64} ~
h2 {"family":"Riccione","size":36} → {"family":"Inter","size":44} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.