Anytype vs Peloton
60 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #0d0d0d Text
#ffffff → #ffffff Brand
#3cd9b3 → #cb1e4e Border
#262626 → #333333 Display font
Riccione → Inter Body size
16px → 16px colors 52 changed
~
bg #000000 → #0d0d0d ~
surface #0d0d0d → #1a1a1a ~
text-muted #8a8a8a → #b3b3b3 ~
text-faint #5c5c5c → #666666 ~
brand #3cd9b3 → #cb1e4e ~
brand-hover #2fc4a0 → #a51840 ~
brand-active #27a98a → #841234 ~
brand-soft #0e2b25 → #1f0a10 ~
border #262626 → #333333 ~
border-soft #1a1a1a → #262626 ~
border-strong #3a3a3a → #4d4d4d ~
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.65) → rgba(0,0,0,0.4) ~
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.70) → rgba(0,0,0,0.7) ~
success #4cad00 → #1cb350 ~
warning #ffb522 → #ffa726 ~
danger #ff6a7b → #ff4d4f ~
info #18a3f1 → #3b82f6 +
bg-strong #000000 +
bg-elev #1a1a1a +
bg-elev-strong #262626 +
surface-soft #262626 +
surface-strong #333333 +
surface-light #f5f5f5 +
brand-pale #f8d9e2 +
brand-deep #5e0a23 +
text-soft #8a8a8a +
text-on-brand #ffffff +
link #ffffff +
link-hover #cb1e4e +
border-input #666666 +
live-red #cb1e4e +
leaderboard-gold #ffc300 +
leaderboard-silver #c0c0c0 +
leaderboard-bronze #cd7f32 +
pr-record #ffc300 +
shadow-elev rgba(0,0,0,0.6) −
bg-deep #000000 −
surface-elev #1a1a1a −
surface-hover #242424 −
text-secondary #b8b8b8 −
brand-text #3cd9b3 −
on-brand #000000 −
any-teal #3cd9b3 −
any-blue #18a3f1 −
any-green #4cad00 −
any-amber #ffb522 −
border-brand #3cd9b3 −
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.50) −
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.80) −
success-soft #0f2200 −
warning-soft #2a1d00 −
danger-soft #2e1115 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Riccione","size":88} → {"family":"Inter","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"Riccione","size":48} → {"family":"Inter","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Riccione","size":36} → {"family":"Inter","size":32} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"Inter","size":11} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 4 changed
~
xs 0px → 4px ~
sm 4px → 8px ~
md 12px → 16px ~
xl 64px → 48px