Anytype vs Brilliant
55 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #0c0e16 Text
#ffffff → #ffffff Brand
#3cd9b3 → #fc6e51 Border
#262626 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) Display font
Riccione → Brilliant Sans Body size
16px → 16px colors 48 changed
~
bg #000000 → #0c0e16 ~
bg-deep #000000 → #06070d ~
surface #0d0d0d → #13151f ~
text-muted #8a8a8a → #a8acba ~
text-faint #5c5c5c → #5a5e6c ~
brand #3cd9b3 → #fc6e51 ~
brand-hover #2fc4a0 → #ff8268 ~
on-brand #000000 → #ffffff ~
border #262626 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) ~
border-strong #3a3a3a → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.16) ~
border-brand #3cd9b3 → #fc6e51 ~
success #4cad00 → #5ac38a ~
warning #ffb522 → #ffd44d ~
danger #ff6a7b → #ff5a6d ~
info #18a3f1 → #5ac3e5 +
bg-section #13151f +
bg-elev #1c1f2c +
surface-strong #1f2230 +
brand-pressed #e25738 +
brand-deep #b8401f +
brand-tint rgba(252, 110, 81, 0.15) +
text-soft #7a7e8c +
text-on-brand #ffffff +
link #fc6e51 +
link-hover #ffffff +
selected-bg rgba(252, 110, 81, 0.15) +
diagram-coral #fc6e51 +
diagram-yellow #ffd44d +
diagram-cyan #5ac3e5 +
diagram-purple #b582ff −
surface-elev #1a1a1a −
surface-hover #242424 −
text-secondary #b8b8b8 −
brand-active #27a98a −
brand-text #3cd9b3 −
brand-soft #0e2b25 −
any-teal #3cd9b3 −
any-blue #18a3f1 −
any-green #4cad00 −
any-amber #ffb522 −
border-soft #1a1a1a −
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.50) −
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.65) −
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.80) −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.70) −
success-soft #0f2200 −
warning-soft #2a1d00 −
danger-soft #2e1115 typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Riccione","size":88} → {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":88} ~
h1 {"family":"Riccione","size":48} → {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Riccione","size":36} → {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 2 changed
~
lg 32px → 24px ~
xl 64px → 40px