Diff

Adidas vs Chase

60 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#ffffff #ffffff
Text
#000000 #101820
Brand
#000000 #0060f0
Border
#cccccc #d4d9e0
Display font
adidasFG Open Sans
Body size
16px 16px
colors 49 changed
~ surface-soft #f5f5f5 #f5f7fa
~ brand #000000 #0060f0
~ brand-hover #1d1d1d #0048bf
~ text #000000 #101820
~ text-muted #767677 #5a6470
~ link #000000 #0060f0
~ link-hover #000000 #0048bf
~ border #cccccc #d4d9e0
~ border-strong #000000 #9aa3af
~ scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.7) rgba(16,24,32,0.55)
~ success #1a8917 #128842
~ warning #bd5c00 #9a5b00
~ danger #c12121 #c4001a
~ info #0064d2 #0060f0
+ surface-tint #eef4ff
+ text-faint #6b7280
+ text-on-brand #ffffff
+ text-on-green #ffffff
+ brand-deep #003594
+ secondary #128842
+ secondary-hover #0e6e35
+ border-on-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.24)
+ shadow-soft rgba(16,24,32,0.06)
+ shadow-medium rgba(16,24,32,0.12)
+ shadow-deep rgba(16,24,32,0.20)
+ on-brand #ffffff
bg-page #ffffff
bg-inverse #000000
surface-strong #ececec
surface-grey #767677
surface-dark #1d1d1d
brand-on-dark #ffffff
brand-active #3c3c3c
trefoil-red #e32b2b
sale-red #e32b2b
text-strong #000000
text-soft #a8a8a8
text-on-black #ffffff
text-on-cta #ffffff
link-underline currentColor
border-soft #ececec
border-input #000000
border-divider #000000
outline-focus #000000
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.06)
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.20)
warning-soft #fff4e5
rating-fill #000000
rating-empty #cccccc
typography 5 changed
~ display {"family":"adidasFG","size":72} {"family":"Open Sans","size":80}
~ h1 {"family":"adidasFG","size":40} {"family":"Open Sans","size":40}
~ h2 {"family":"adidasFG","size":32} {"family":"Open Sans","size":32}
~ body {"family":"AdihausDIN","size":16} {"family":"Open Sans","size":16}
~ label {"family":"Monaco","size":11} {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13}
radius 2 changed
~ button 0px 8px
~ card 0px 12px
spacing 4 changed
~ xs 4px 0px
~ sm 8px 4px
~ md 16px 12px
~ xl 48px 64px
↻ Swap direction · Chase → Adidas