Accenture vs Tinybird
55 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0a0a0a → #0a0a0a Text
#ffffff → #ffffff Brand
#a600ff → #27f795 Border
#2e2e2e → #262626 Display font
Graphik → Inter Body size
16px → 16px colors 51 changed
~
surface #141414 → #151515 ~
surface-soft #1c1c1c → #101010 ~
text-strong #ffffff → #e6e6e6 ~
text-body #e6e6e6 → #b0b0b0 ~
text-muted #a3a3a3 → #888888 ~
brand #a600ff → #27f795 ~
on-brand #ffffff → #0a0a0a ~
border #2e2e2e → #262626 ~
border-strong #4d4d4d → #383838 ~
link #ffffff → #27f795 ~
link-hover #a600ff → #1fd87f ~
success #3ad29f → #27f795 ~
warning #ffb800 → #fc9f5b ~
danger #ff5252 → #ff8389 ~
info #a600ff → #00c1ff +
bg-deep #000000 +
surface-elevated #1e1e1e +
surface-mint-tint rgba(255,255,255,0.05) +
text-faint #5a5a5a +
brand-dark #008060 +
brand-active #1fd87f +
brand-disabled #16402e +
on-brand-dark #ffffff +
on-dark #ffffff +
border-mint #27f795 +
shadow-color rgba(0,0,0,0.6) +
shadow-glow-mint rgba(39,247,149,0.18) +
code-text #ffffff +
code-invocation #27f795 +
code-success #27f795 +
code-error #ff8389 +
code-identifier #00c1ff +
code-value #fc9f5b +
code-diff-added #008060 −
bg-pure #000000 −
surface-strong #262626 −
surface-light #ffffff −
surface-light-soft #f2f2f2 −
text-soft #6b6b6b −
text-on-light #0a0a0a −
text-on-light-mute #525252 −
brand-bright #be4bff −
brand-deep #7d00c4 −
brand-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) −
border-on-light #e0e0e0 −
focus #a600ff −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.7) −
success-soft rgba(58,210,159,0.14) −
warning-soft rgba(255,184,0,0.14) −
danger-soft rgba(255,82,82,0.14) −
info-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Graphik","size":80} → {"family":"Inter","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Graphik","size":40} → {"family":"Inter","size":64} ~
h2 {"family":"Graphik","size":32} → {"family":"Inter","size":44} ~
body {"family":"Graphik","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.