Accenture vs Sourcegraph
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0a0a0a → #1a1817 Text
#ffffff → #ededed Brand
#a600ff → #f34e3f Border
#2e2e2e → #34302d Display font
Graphik → PolySans Body size
16px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #0a0a0a → #1a1817 ~
surface #141414 → #222222 ~
surface-soft #1c1c1c → #1f1d1c ~
surface-strong #262626 → #2c2a28 ~
text #ffffff → #ededed ~
text-muted #a3a3a3 → #a0a0a0 ~
text-soft #6b6b6b → #b8b8b8 ~
brand #a600ff → #f34e3f ~
brand-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) → rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) ~
border #2e2e2e → #34302d ~
border-strong #4d4d4d → #48433f ~
link #ffffff → #f34e3f ~
link-hover #a600ff → #ff6354 +
bg-soft #211f1d +
bg-elev #252321 +
text-faint #7a7672 +
brand-hover #ff6354 +
brand-emphasis #d63b2d +
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e +
border-soft #2a2724 +
focus-ring #f34e3f +
semantic-success #4ec77f +
semantic-warning #e0a64b +
semantic-danger #f34e3f +
semantic-info #5aa9f0 +
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) +
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) +
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) −
bg-pure #000000 −
surface-light #ffffff −
surface-light-soft #f2f2f2 −
text-body #e6e6e6 −
text-on-light #0a0a0a −
text-on-light-mute #525252 −
brand-bright #be4bff −
brand-deep #7d00c4 −
border-on-light #e0e0e0 −
focus #a600ff −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.7) −
success #3ad29f −
success-soft rgba(58,210,159,0.14) −
warning #ffb800 −
warning-soft rgba(255,184,0,0.14) −
danger #ff5252 −
danger-soft rgba(255,82,82,0.14) −
info #a600ff −
info-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Graphik","size":80} → {"family":"PolySans","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Graphik","size":40} → {"family":"PolySans","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Graphik","size":32} → {"family":"PolySans","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Graphik","size":16} → {"family":"PolySans","size":16} radius 1 changed
~
card 12px → 24px spacing identical
No differences.