Accenture vs Picoko
54 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0a0a0a → #fbfaf8 Text
#ffffff → #121110 Brand
#a600ff → #fe1c71 Border
#2e2e2e → rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.08) Display font
Graphik → Outfit Body size
16px → 16px colors 48 changed
~
bg #0a0a0a → #fbfaf8 ~
surface #141414 → #ffffff ~
surface-soft #1c1c1c → #f9f8f6 ~
text #ffffff → #121110 ~
text-strong #ffffff → #0a0909 ~
text-muted #a3a3a3 → #6b6663 ~
text-soft #6b6b6b → #9c9793 ~
brand #a600ff → #fe1c71 ~
brand-deep #7d00c4 → #e5005c ~
brand-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) → rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.10) ~
border #2e2e2e → rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.08) ~
border-strong #4d4d4d → rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.16) ~
link #ffffff → #121110 ~
link-hover #a600ff → #fe1c71 +
bg-alt #f5f3f0 +
surface-elevated #ffffff +
text-faint #c3bfbb +
selected-bg rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.08) +
disabled #c3bfbb +
border-subtle rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.04) +
border-brand rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.30) +
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.10) +
success-text #15803d +
warning-bg rgba(234, 179, 8, 0.12) +
warning-text #a16207 +
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.10) +
danger-text #b91c1c +
info-bg rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.08) +
info-text #c0004e −
bg-pure #000000 −
surface-strong #262626 −
surface-light #ffffff −
surface-light-soft #f2f2f2 −
text-body #e6e6e6 −
text-on-light #0a0a0a −
text-on-light-mute #525252 −
brand-bright #be4bff −
border-on-light #e0e0e0 −
focus #a600ff −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.7) −
success #3ad29f −
success-soft rgba(58,210,159,0.14) −
warning #ffb800 −
warning-soft rgba(255,184,0,0.14) −
danger #ff5252 −
danger-soft rgba(255,82,82,0.14) −
info #a600ff −
info-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Graphik","size":80} → {"family":"Outfit","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"Graphik","size":40} → {"family":"Outfit","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Graphik","size":32} → {"family":"Outfit","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Graphik","size":16} → {"family":"Outfit","size":16} radius 2 changed
~
card 12px → 16px ~
pill 9999px → 32px spacing identical
No differences.