Aave vs Udio
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #000000 Text
#211d1d → #f9f9f9 Brand
#978fff → #e30b5d Border
#e8e6ec → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) Display font
Aave Repro → InnovatorFont Body size
16px → 16px colors 46 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #000000 ~
surface #ffffff → #0a0a0a ~
surface-soft #faf9ff → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) ~
surface-strong #f1eeff → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) ~
brand #978fff → #e30b5d ~
brand-deep #5b4fee → #c2094f ~
brand-soft #c9c3ff → rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) ~
text #211d1d → #f9f9f9 ~
text-strong #000000 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #5c5658 → #c2c2c2 ~
text-soft #8a8488 → #8a8a8a ~
text-faint #c4c0c2 → #737373 ~
link #5b4fee → #f9f9f9 ~
link-hover #5448d6 → #e30b5d ~
selected-bg #ece9ff → rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) ~
border #e8e6ec → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) ~
border-strong #d5d2dd → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) +
bg-alt #08080a +
disabled #737373 +
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) +
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) +
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) +
success-text #86efac +
warning-bg rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) +
warning-text #fcd34d +
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) +
danger-text #fca5a5 +
info-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
info-text #c2c2c2 −
bg-soft #f7f6ff −
bg-lavender #f1eeff −
brand-hover #857cf5 −
brand-pressed #6f63ff −
brand-strong #5448d6 −
brand-tint #ece9ff −
text-on-brand #ffffff −
border-soft #f2f1f6 −
border-brand #978fff −
gradient-pink #ffb8e6 −
gradient-peach #ffd6b8 −
gradient-mint #b8f0d6 −
gradient-sky #b8d6ff −
success #1bbf8a −
warning #f5b948 −
danger #f0506e −
info #5b4fee typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Aave Repro","size":88} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Aave Repro","size":72} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} ~
h2 {"family":"Aave Repro","size":48} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} ~
body {"family":"Aave Repro","size":16} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} radius 2 changed
~
button 12px → 8px ~
card 16px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.