Diff

SAP vs Rare Beauty

62 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#ffffff #fdf6f0
Text
#1d2d3e #1a1a1a
Brand
#0070f2 #9b6dd4
Border
#d8dee5 #e8dccd
Display font
72 Recoleta
Body size
16px 16px
colors 52 changed
~ bg #ffffff #fdf6f0
~ bg-soft #f5f6f7 #faf0e6
~ surface-soft #f5f6f7 #fdf8f0
~ brand #0070f2 #9b6dd4
~ brand-hover #0040b0 #8557c0
~ brand-soft #ebf8ff #d2bfe8
~ text #1d2d3e #1a1a1a
~ text-strong #0a2540 #000000
~ text-soft #556270 #8a8a8a
~ text-faint #8b95a3 #bcbcbc
~ border #d8dee5 #e8dccd
~ border-soft #eaecee #f0e6d8
~ border-strong #a8b1bd #cdb89c
~ link #0070f2 #9b6dd4
~ link-hover #0040b0 #6e44a8
~ success #36a41d #3d8b62
~ warning #e76500 #cb9c45
~ danger #d20a0a #a85353
~ info #0070f2 #9b6dd4
+ bg-deeper #f5e8d8
+ bg-warm #fdf3e8
+ surface-cream #f9efe0
+ brand-pressed #6e44a8
+ brand-deep #583590
+ brand-tint #e8dbf5
+ text-muted #5a5a5a
+ text-on-brand #ffffff
+ selected-bg #e8dbf5
+ border-brand #9b6dd4
+ blush #e8a8a8
+ rose #d4847a
+ amber #cb9c45
bg-section #eaecee
bg-feature #1d2d3e
bg-footer #1d2d3e
bg-cool #ebf8ff
surface-elev #ffffff
brand-active #002a77
brand-subtle #d1efff
navy #1d2d3e
navy-deep #0a2540
text-on-dark #ffffff
text-on-dark-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.78)
link-visited #5d36ff
success-soft #e9f8ec
warning-soft #fff3e0
danger-soft #fde1e1
info-soft #ebf8ff
scrim rgba(29,45,62,0.55)
shadow-card rgba(29,45,62,0.10)
shadow-elev rgba(29,45,62,0.18)
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.20)
typography 5 changed
~ display {"family":"72","size":72} {"family":"Recoleta","size":72}
~ h1 {"family":"72","size":44} {"family":"Recoleta","size":36}
~ h2 {"family":"72","size":36} {"family":"Recoleta","size":28}
~ body {"family":"72","size":16} {"family":"Inter","size":16}
~ label {"family":"72 Mono","size":14} {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":12}
radius identical
No differences.
spacing 5 changed
~ xs 4px 0px
~ sm 8px 4px
~ md 16px 12px
~ lg 32px 24px
~ xl 48px 40px
↻ Swap direction · Rare Beauty → SAP