Diff

SAP vs Patagonia

65 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#ffffff #f6efe1
Text
#1d2d3e #1c1c1c
Brand
#0070f2 #cd0000
Border
#d8dee5 #d8d0bc
Display font
72 Futura PT
Body size
16px 16px
colors 53 changed
~ bg #ffffff #f6efe1
~ bg-soft #f5f6f7 #fdf9ed
~ surface-soft #f5f6f7 #fbf8ed
~ brand #0070f2 #cd0000
~ brand-hover #0040b0 #a80000
~ text #1d2d3e #1c1c1c
~ text-strong #0a2540 #000000
~ text-soft #556270 #8a8a8a
~ text-faint #8b95a3 #bcbcbc
~ border #d8dee5 #d8d0bc
~ border-soft #eaecee #e8e0c8
~ border-strong #a8b1bd #bcb09a
~ link #0070f2 #cd0000
~ link-hover #0040b0 #820000
~ success #36a41d #3d4a2e
~ warning #e76500 #cb9c45
~ danger #d20a0a #a80000
~ info #0070f2 #3d4a2e
+ bg-deeper #ebe3d0
+ bg-warm #f9f3e3
+ surface-deeper #ede5d0
+ brand-pressed #820000
+ brand-deep #5a0000
+ brand-tint #fde0e0
+ forest #3d4a2e
+ forest-deep #293421
+ forest-soft #dde3d4
+ text-muted #5a5a5a
+ text-on-brand #ffffff
+ selected-bg #fde0e0
+ border-brand #cd0000
+ amber #cb9c45
bg-section #eaecee
bg-feature #1d2d3e
bg-footer #1d2d3e
bg-cool #ebf8ff
surface-elev #ffffff
brand-active #002a77
brand-subtle #d1efff
brand-soft #ebf8ff
navy #1d2d3e
navy-deep #0a2540
text-on-dark #ffffff
text-on-dark-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.78)
link-visited #5d36ff
success-soft #e9f8ec
warning-soft #fff3e0
danger-soft #fde1e1
info-soft #ebf8ff
scrim rgba(29,45,62,0.55)
shadow-card rgba(29,45,62,0.10)
shadow-elev rgba(29,45,62,0.18)
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.20)
typography 5 changed
~ display {"family":"72","size":72} {"family":"Futura PT","size":80}
~ h1 {"family":"72","size":44} {"family":"Futura PT","size":36}
~ h2 {"family":"72","size":36} {"family":"Futura PT","size":28}
~ body {"family":"72","size":16} {"family":"Futura PT","size":16}
~ label {"family":"72 Mono","size":14} {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":12}
radius 2 changed
~ button 6px 4px
~ card 8px 14px
spacing 5 changed
~ xs 4px 0px
~ sm 8px 4px
~ md 16px 12px
~ lg 32px 24px
~ xl 48px 40px
↻ Swap direction · Patagonia → SAP