SAP vs Hilton
58 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #ffffff Text
#1d2d3e → #1a1a1a Brand
#0070f2 → #005091 Border
#d8dee5 → #dcdfe4 Display font
72 → Söhne Body size
16px → 16px colors 48 changed
~
bg-soft #f5f6f7 → #f4f6f9 ~
surface-soft #f5f6f7 → #fafbfc ~
brand #0070f2 → #005091 ~
brand-hover #0040b0 → #003d75 ~
brand-soft #ebf8ff → #cee0f0 ~
text #1d2d3e → #1a1a1a ~
text-strong #0a2540 → #000000 ~
text-soft #556270 → #8a8a8a ~
text-faint #8b95a3 → #bcbcbc ~
border #d8dee5 → #dcdfe4 ~
border-soft #eaecee → #eef0f4 ~
border-strong #a8b1bd → #bcc0c8 ~
link #0070f2 → #005091 ~
link-hover #0040b0 → #003d75 ~
success #36a41d → #1a8757 ~
warning #e76500 → #cc8800 ~
danger #d20a0a → #c4313a ~
info #0070f2 → #005091 +
bg-warm #faf9f6 +
surface-strong #f4f6f9 +
brand-pressed #002a52 +
brand-deep #001b38 +
brand-tint #e0ebf6 +
text-muted #5a5a5a +
text-on-brand #ffffff +
selected-bg #e0ebf6 +
border-brand #005091 +
honors-purple #67266c −
bg-section #eaecee −
bg-feature #1d2d3e −
bg-footer #1d2d3e −
bg-cool #ebf8ff −
surface-elev #ffffff −
brand-active #002a77 −
brand-subtle #d1efff −
navy #1d2d3e −
navy-deep #0a2540 −
text-on-dark #ffffff −
text-on-dark-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.78) −
link-visited #5d36ff −
success-soft #e9f8ec −
warning-soft #fff3e0 −
danger-soft #fde1e1 −
info-soft #ebf8ff −
scrim rgba(29,45,62,0.55) −
shadow-card rgba(29,45,62,0.10) −
shadow-elev rgba(29,45,62,0.18) −
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.20) typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"72","size":72} → {"family":"Söhne","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"72","size":44} → {"family":"Söhne","size":36} ~
h2 {"family":"72","size":36} → {"family":"Söhne","size":28} ~
body {"family":"72","size":16} → {"family":"Söhne","size":16} ~
label {"family":"72 Mono","size":14} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 5 changed
~
xs 4px → 0px ~
sm 8px → 4px ~
md 16px → 12px ~
lg 32px → 24px ~
xl 48px → 40px