Rare Beauty vs SAP
62 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#fdf6f0 → #ffffff Text
#1a1a1a → #1d2d3e Brand
#9b6dd4 → #0070f2 Border
#e8dccd → #d8dee5 Display font
Recoleta → 72 Body size
16px → 16px colors 52 changed
~
bg #fdf6f0 → #ffffff ~
bg-soft #faf0e6 → #f5f6f7 ~
surface-soft #fdf8f0 → #f5f6f7 ~
brand #9b6dd4 → #0070f2 ~
brand-hover #8557c0 → #0040b0 ~
brand-soft #d2bfe8 → #ebf8ff ~
text #1a1a1a → #1d2d3e ~
text-strong #000000 → #0a2540 ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #556270 ~
text-faint #bcbcbc → #8b95a3 ~
link #9b6dd4 → #0070f2 ~
link-hover #6e44a8 → #0040b0 ~
border #e8dccd → #d8dee5 ~
border-strong #cdb89c → #a8b1bd ~
border-soft #f0e6d8 → #eaecee ~
success #3d8b62 → #36a41d ~
warning #cb9c45 → #e76500 ~
danger #a85353 → #d20a0a ~
info #9b6dd4 → #0070f2 +
bg-section #eaecee +
bg-feature #1d2d3e +
bg-footer #1d2d3e +
bg-cool #ebf8ff +
surface-elev #ffffff +
brand-active #002a77 +
brand-subtle #d1efff +
navy #1d2d3e +
navy-deep #0a2540 +
text-on-dark #ffffff +
text-on-dark-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.78) +
link-visited #5d36ff +
success-soft #e9f8ec +
warning-soft #fff3e0 +
danger-soft #fde1e1 +
info-soft #ebf8ff +
scrim rgba(29,45,62,0.55) +
shadow-card rgba(29,45,62,0.10) +
shadow-elev rgba(29,45,62,0.18) +
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.20) −
bg-deeper #f5e8d8 −
bg-warm #fdf3e8 −
surface-cream #f9efe0 −
brand-pressed #6e44a8 −
brand-deep #583590 −
brand-tint #e8dbf5 −
text-muted #5a5a5a −
text-on-brand #ffffff −
selected-bg #e8dbf5 −
border-brand #9b6dd4 −
blush #e8a8a8 −
rose #d4847a −
amber #cb9c45 typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Recoleta","size":72} → {"family":"72","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"Recoleta","size":36} → {"family":"72","size":44} ~
h2 {"family":"Recoleta","size":28} → {"family":"72","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"72","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":12} → {"family":"72 Mono","size":14} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 5 changed
~
xs 0px → 4px ~
sm 4px → 8px ~
md 12px → 16px ~
lg 24px → 32px ~
xl 40px → 48px