Patagonia vs Tana
60 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#f6efe1 → #000000 Text
#1c1c1c → #f0eded Brand
#cd0000 → #e1f0bd Border
#d8d0bc → #1f1f1f Display font
Futura PT → tanaClassic Body size
16px → 17px colors 48 changed
~
bg #f6efe1 → #000000 ~
bg-soft #fdf9ed → #0a0a0a ~
surface #ffffff → #141414 ~
brand #cd0000 → #e1f0bd ~
brand-hover #a80000 → #cde0a3 ~
on-brand #ffffff → #000000 ~
text #1c1c1c → #f0eded ~
text-strong #000000 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #5a5a5a → #a8a5a3 ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #7a7775 ~
text-faint #bcbcbc → #555250 ~
text-on-brand #ffffff → #000000 ~
link #cd0000 → #e1f0bd ~
link-hover #820000 → #ffffff ~
border #d8d0bc → #1f1f1f ~
border-strong #bcb09a → #2a2a2a ~
border-soft #e8e0c8 → #161616 ~
success #3d4a2e → #a8d896 ~
warning #cb9c45 → #e6c07a ~
danger #a80000 → #e89a8d ~
info #3d4a2e → #9bb8d4 +
bg-deep #050505 +
surface-raised #1a1a1a +
surface-overlay #1f1f1f +
surface-inverted #f0eded +
text-on-inverted #0a0a0a +
brand-active #b8cc88 +
brand-soft #1f2516 +
accent-italic #d4caa8 +
accent-italic-soft #a8a08a +
border-inverted #d8d5d3 +
focus-ring #e1f0bd +
selection-bg #e1f0bd +
selection-text #000000 +
shadow rgba(0,0,0,0.6) −
bg-deeper #ebe3d0 −
bg-warm #f9f3e3 −
surface-soft #fbf8ed −
surface-deeper #ede5d0 −
brand-pressed #820000 −
brand-deep #5a0000 −
brand-tint #fde0e0 −
forest #3d4a2e −
forest-deep #293421 −
forest-soft #dde3d4 −
selected-bg #fde0e0 −
border-brand #cd0000 −
amber #cb9c45 typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Futura PT","size":80} → {"family":"tanaClassic","size":83} ~
h1 {"family":"Futura PT","size":36} → {"family":"tanaClassic","size":42} ~
h2 {"family":"Futura PT","size":28} → {"family":"tanaClassic","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Futura PT","size":16} → {"family":"SF Pro","size":17} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":12} → {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":12} radius 2 changed
~
button 4px → 8px ~
card 14px → 24px spacing 5 changed
~
xs 0px → 4px ~
sm 4px → 8px ~
md 12px → 16px ~
lg 24px → 32px ~
xl 40px → 64px