Diff

Patagonia vs SAP

65 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#f6efe1 #ffffff
Text
#1c1c1c #1d2d3e
Brand
#cd0000 #0070f2
Border
#d8d0bc #d8dee5
Display font
Futura PT 72
Body size
16px 16px
colors 53 changed
~ bg #f6efe1 #ffffff
~ bg-soft #fdf9ed #f5f6f7
~ surface-soft #fbf8ed #f5f6f7
~ brand #cd0000 #0070f2
~ brand-hover #a80000 #0040b0
~ text #1c1c1c #1d2d3e
~ text-strong #000000 #0a2540
~ text-soft #8a8a8a #556270
~ text-faint #bcbcbc #8b95a3
~ link #cd0000 #0070f2
~ link-hover #820000 #0040b0
~ border #d8d0bc #d8dee5
~ border-strong #bcb09a #a8b1bd
~ border-soft #e8e0c8 #eaecee
~ success #3d4a2e #36a41d
~ warning #cb9c45 #e76500
~ danger #a80000 #d20a0a
~ info #3d4a2e #0070f2
+ bg-section #eaecee
+ bg-feature #1d2d3e
+ bg-footer #1d2d3e
+ bg-cool #ebf8ff
+ surface-elev #ffffff
+ brand-active #002a77
+ brand-subtle #d1efff
+ brand-soft #ebf8ff
+ navy #1d2d3e
+ navy-deep #0a2540
+ text-on-dark #ffffff
+ text-on-dark-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.78)
+ link-visited #5d36ff
+ success-soft #e9f8ec
+ warning-soft #fff3e0
+ danger-soft #fde1e1
+ info-soft #ebf8ff
+ scrim rgba(29,45,62,0.55)
+ shadow-card rgba(29,45,62,0.10)
+ shadow-elev rgba(29,45,62,0.18)
+ shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.20)
bg-deeper #ebe3d0
bg-warm #f9f3e3
surface-deeper #ede5d0
brand-pressed #820000
brand-deep #5a0000
brand-tint #fde0e0
forest #3d4a2e
forest-deep #293421
forest-soft #dde3d4
text-muted #5a5a5a
text-on-brand #ffffff
selected-bg #fde0e0
border-brand #cd0000
amber #cb9c45
typography 5 changed
~ display {"family":"Futura PT","size":80} {"family":"72","size":72}
~ h1 {"family":"Futura PT","size":36} {"family":"72","size":44}
~ h2 {"family":"Futura PT","size":28} {"family":"72","size":36}
~ body {"family":"Futura PT","size":16} {"family":"72","size":16}
~ label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":12} {"family":"72 Mono","size":14}
radius 2 changed
~ button 4px 6px
~ card 14px 8px
spacing 5 changed
~ xs 0px 4px
~ sm 4px 8px
~ md 12px 16px
~ lg 24px 32px
~ xl 40px 48px
↻ Swap direction · SAP → Patagonia