Patagonia vs Phantom
48 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#f6efe1 → #0c0c0e Text
#1c1c1c → #ffffff Brand
#cd0000 → #ab9ff2 Border
#d8d0bc → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) Display font
Futura PT → Phantom Sans Body size
16px → 15px colors 41 changed
~
bg #f6efe1 → #0c0c0e ~
surface #ffffff → #15151a ~
brand #cd0000 → #ab9ff2 ~
brand-hover #a80000 → #bdb3f6 ~
brand-pressed #820000 → #9b8ee8 ~
brand-deep #5a0000 → #534bb1 ~
brand-tint #fde0e0 → rgba(171, 159, 242, 0.15) ~
on-brand #ffffff → #0c0c0e ~
text #1c1c1c → #ffffff ~
text-strong #000000 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #5a5a5a → #a8a8b8 ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #7a7a8c ~
text-faint #bcbcbc → #5a5a6c ~
text-on-brand #ffffff → #0c0c0e ~
link #cd0000 → #ab9ff2 ~
link-hover #820000 → #ffffff ~
selected-bg #fde0e0 → rgba(171, 159, 242, 0.15) ~
border #d8d0bc → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) ~
border-strong #bcb09a → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.16) ~
border-brand #cd0000 → #ab9ff2 ~
success #3d4a2e → #5dd4a8 ~
warning #cb9c45 → #f5c842 ~
danger #a80000 → #ff6b6b ~
info #3d4a2e → #ab9ff2 +
bg-deep #06060a +
bg-section #15151a +
bg-elev #1f1f25 +
surface-strong #22222a +
surface-translucent rgba(12, 12, 14, 0.85) +
brand-deeper #3d3686 +
ghost-glow #ab9ff2 −
bg-soft #fdf9ed −
bg-deeper #ebe3d0 −
bg-warm #f9f3e3 −
surface-soft #fbf8ed −
surface-deeper #ede5d0 −
forest #3d4a2e −
forest-deep #293421 −
forest-soft #dde3d4 −
border-soft #e8e0c8 −
amber #cb9c45 typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Futura PT","size":80} → {"family":"Phantom Sans","size":88} ~
h1 {"family":"Futura PT","size":36} → {"family":"Phantom Sans","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Futura PT","size":28} → {"family":"Phantom Sans","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Futura PT","size":16} → {"family":"Phantom Sans","size":15} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":12} → {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":12} radius 2 changed
~
button 4px → 8px ~
card 14px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.