Marriott vs SAP
61 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#f9f6f0 → #ffffff Text
#2a2a2a → #1d2d3e Brand
#a4793f → #0070f2 Border
#e0d9c8 → #d8dee5 Display font
Caudex → 72 Body size
16px → 16px colors 49 changed
~
bg #f9f6f0 → #ffffff ~
bg-soft #f5efe5 → #f5f6f7 ~
surface-soft #fdfcf8 → #f5f6f7 ~
brand #a4793f → #0070f2 ~
brand-hover #8d6232 → #0040b0 ~
navy #1f2a44 → #1d2d3e ~
navy-deep #141d33 → #0a2540 ~
text #2a2a2a → #1d2d3e ~
text-strong #1f2a44 → #0a2540 ~
text-soft #8c8c8c → #556270 ~
text-faint #b8b8b8 → #8b95a3 ~
link #a4793f → #0070f2 ~
link-hover #1f2a44 → #0040b0 ~
border #e0d9c8 → #d8dee5 ~
border-strong #c8bea8 → #a8b1bd ~
border-soft #f0eadd → #eaecee ~
success #3d8b62 → #36a41d ~
warning #c5832e → #e76500 ~
danger #a93535 → #d20a0a ~
info #1f2a44 → #0070f2 +
bg-section #eaecee +
bg-feature #1d2d3e +
bg-footer #1d2d3e +
bg-cool #ebf8ff +
surface-elev #ffffff +
brand-active #002a77 +
brand-subtle #d1efff +
brand-soft #ebf8ff +
text-on-dark #ffffff +
text-on-dark-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.78) +
link-visited #5d36ff +
success-soft #e9f8ec +
warning-soft #fff3e0 +
danger-soft #fde1e1 +
info-soft #ebf8ff +
scrim rgba(29,45,62,0.55) +
shadow-card rgba(29,45,62,0.10) +
shadow-elev rgba(29,45,62,0.18) +
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.20) −
bg-warm #fdf9f2 −
surface-strong #f5efe5 −
brand-pressed #6e4d27 −
brand-deep #553c1e −
brand-tint #f5e9d4 −
navy-soft rgba(31, 42, 68, 0.06) −
text-muted #6a6a6a −
text-on-brand #ffffff −
selected-bg #f5e9d4 −
border-brand #a4793f typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Caudex","size":80} → {"family":"72","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"Caudex","size":36} → {"family":"72","size":44} ~
h2 {"family":"Caudex","size":28} → {"family":"72","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Avenir Next","size":16} → {"family":"72","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":12} → {"family":"72 Mono","size":14} radius 2 changed
~
button 4px → 6px ~
card 6px → 8px spacing 5 changed
~
xs 0px → 4px ~
sm 4px → 8px ~
md 12px → 16px ~
lg 24px → 32px ~
xl 40px → 48px