Diff

Brilliant vs Patagonia

47 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#0c0e16 #f6efe1
Text
#ffffff #1c1c1c
Brand
#fc6e51 #cd0000
Border
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) #d8d0bc
Display font
Brilliant Sans Futura PT
Body size
16px 16px
colors 40 changed
~ bg #0c0e16 #f6efe1
~ surface #13151f #ffffff
~ brand #fc6e51 #cd0000
~ brand-hover #ff8268 #a80000
~ brand-pressed #e25738 #820000
~ brand-deep #b8401f #5a0000
~ brand-tint rgba(252, 110, 81, 0.15) #fde0e0
~ text #ffffff #1c1c1c
~ text-strong #ffffff #000000
~ text-muted #a8acba #5a5a5a
~ text-soft #7a7e8c #8a8a8a
~ text-faint #5a5e6c #bcbcbc
~ link #fc6e51 #cd0000
~ link-hover #ffffff #820000
~ selected-bg rgba(252, 110, 81, 0.15) #fde0e0
~ border rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) #d8d0bc
~ border-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.16) #bcb09a
~ border-brand #fc6e51 #cd0000
~ success #5ac38a #3d4a2e
~ warning #ffd44d #cb9c45
~ danger #ff5a6d #a80000
~ info #5ac3e5 #3d4a2e
+ bg-soft #fdf9ed
+ bg-deeper #ebe3d0
+ bg-warm #f9f3e3
+ surface-soft #fbf8ed
+ surface-deeper #ede5d0
+ forest #3d4a2e
+ forest-deep #293421
+ forest-soft #dde3d4
+ border-soft #e8e0c8
+ amber #cb9c45
bg-deep #06070d
bg-section #13151f
bg-elev #1c1f2c
surface-strong #1f2230
diagram-coral #fc6e51
diagram-yellow #ffd44d
diagram-cyan #5ac3e5
diagram-purple #b582ff
typography 5 changed
~ display {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":88} {"family":"Futura PT","size":80}
~ h1 {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":40} {"family":"Futura PT","size":36}
~ h2 {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":32} {"family":"Futura PT","size":28}
~ body {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":16} {"family":"Futura PT","size":16}
~ label {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":13} {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":12}
radius 2 changed
~ button 8px 4px
~ card 12px 14px
spacing identical
No differences.
↻ Swap direction · Patagonia → Brilliant