Brilliant vs MetaMask
48 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0c0e16 → #ffffff Text
#ffffff → #1a1a1a Brand
#fc6e51 → #f6851b Border
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) → #d6d9dc Display font
Brilliant Sans → MM Sans Body size
16px → 16px colors 42 changed
~
bg #0c0e16 → #ffffff ~
surface #13151f → #ffffff ~
surface-strong #1f2230 → #f0f0f0 ~
brand #fc6e51 → #f6851b ~
brand-hover #ff8268 → #e3760e ~
brand-pressed #e25738 → #cc6800 ~
brand-deep #b8401f → #a85400 ~
brand-tint rgba(252, 110, 81, 0.15) → #fde5cc ~
text #ffffff → #1a1a1a ~
text-strong #ffffff → #000000 ~
text-muted #a8acba → #535a61 ~
text-soft #7a7e8c → #8e8e8e ~
text-faint #5a5e6c → #bcbcbc ~
link #fc6e51 → #037dd6 ~
link-hover #ffffff → #0260a4 ~
selected-bg rgba(252, 110, 81, 0.15) → #fde5cc ~
border rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) → #d6d9dc ~
border-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.16) → #bbbfc4 ~
border-brand #fc6e51 → #f6851b ~
success #5ac38a → #1a8757 ~
warning #ffd44d → #cc8800 ~
danger #ff5a6d → #d73a49 ~
info #5ac3e5 → #037dd6 +
bg-soft #f5f5f5 +
bg-warm #fdf6ed +
surface-soft #fafafa +
brand-soft #fbcc99 +
fox-blue #037dd6 +
fox-blue-deep #0260a4 +
fox-red #d73a49 +
border-soft #eaecef +
network-eth #627eea +
network-polygon #8247e5 +
network-arbitrum #28a0f0 +
network-optimism #ff0420 −
bg-deep #06070d −
bg-section #13151f −
bg-elev #1c1f2c −
diagram-coral #fc6e51 −
diagram-yellow #ffd44d −
diagram-cyan #5ac3e5 −
diagram-purple #b582ff typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":88} → {"family":"MM Sans","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":40} → {"family":"MM Sans","size":36} ~
h2 {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":32} → {"family":"MM Sans","size":28} ~
body {"family":"Brilliant Sans","size":16} → {"family":"MM Sans","size":16} radius 2 changed
~
button 8px → 12px ~
card 12px → 16px spacing identical
No differences.