Diff

Adidas vs Patagonia

65 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#ffffff #f6efe1
Text
#000000 #1c1c1c
Brand
#000000 #cd0000
Border
#cccccc #d8d0bc
Display font
adidasFG Futura PT
Body size
16px 16px
colors 53 changed
~ bg #ffffff #f6efe1
~ surface-soft #f5f5f5 #fbf8ed
~ brand #000000 #cd0000
~ brand-hover #1d1d1d #a80000
~ text #000000 #1c1c1c
~ text-muted #767677 #5a5a5a
~ text-soft #a8a8a8 #8a8a8a
~ link #000000 #cd0000
~ link-hover #000000 #820000
~ border #cccccc #d8d0bc
~ border-soft #ececec #e8e0c8
~ border-strong #000000 #bcb09a
~ success #1a8917 #3d4a2e
~ warning #bd5c00 #cb9c45
~ danger #c12121 #a80000
~ info #0064d2 #3d4a2e
+ bg-soft #fdf9ed
+ bg-deeper #ebe3d0
+ bg-warm #f9f3e3
+ surface-deeper #ede5d0
+ brand-pressed #820000
+ brand-deep #5a0000
+ brand-tint #fde0e0
+ on-brand #ffffff
+ forest #3d4a2e
+ forest-deep #293421
+ forest-soft #dde3d4
+ text-faint #bcbcbc
+ text-on-brand #ffffff
+ selected-bg #fde0e0
+ border-brand #cd0000
+ amber #cb9c45
bg-page #ffffff
bg-inverse #000000
surface-strong #ececec
surface-grey #767677
surface-dark #1d1d1d
brand-on-dark #ffffff
brand-active #3c3c3c
trefoil-red #e32b2b
sale-red #e32b2b
text-on-black #ffffff
text-on-cta #ffffff
link-underline currentColor
border-input #000000
border-divider #000000
outline-focus #000000
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.7)
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.06)
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.20)
warning-soft #fff4e5
rating-fill #000000
rating-empty #cccccc
typography 5 changed
~ display {"family":"adidasFG","size":72} {"family":"Futura PT","size":80}
~ h1 {"family":"adidasFG","size":40} {"family":"Futura PT","size":36}
~ h2 {"family":"adidasFG","size":32} {"family":"Futura PT","size":28}
~ body {"family":"AdihausDIN","size":16} {"family":"Futura PT","size":16}
~ label {"family":"Monaco","size":11} {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":12}
radius 2 changed
~ button 0px 4px
~ card 0px 14px
spacing 5 changed
~ xs 4px 0px
~ sm 8px 4px
~ md 16px 12px
~ lg 32px 24px
~ xl 48px 40px
↻ Swap direction · Patagonia → Adidas